<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quadrant 99 &#187; 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quadrant99.com/weblog/tag/3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quadrant99.com/weblog</link>
	<description>my little corner in the universe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:17:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New 3-D Movie Technology</title>
		<link>http://quadrant99.com/weblog/2005/03/22/new-3-d-movie-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://quadrant99.com/weblog/2005/03/22/new-3-d-movie-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sparki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quadrant99.com/weblog/2005/03/22/new-3-d-movie-technology/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment News Article &#124; Reuters.co.uk &#8211; I wonder what this could mean for folks with a bad eye. Will this new 3-D moving making thing be so big, that in 10 years everything will use it? Having only one functional &#8230; <a href="http://quadrant99.com/weblog/2005/03/22/new-3-d-movie-technology/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&#038;storyID=2005-03-18T085249Z_01_DEN830004_RTRUKOC_0_FILM-3D.xml">Entertainment News Article | Reuters.co.uk</a> &#8211; I wonder what this could mean for folks with a bad eye.</p>
<p>Will this new 3-D moving making thing be so big, that in 10 years everything will use it? Having only one functional eye, prevents me from ever finding out what is so great about this. </p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s selfish, but part of me doesn&#8217;t ever want to see this happen. I will probably never be able to experience or enjoy them and they could be so popular (who really knows at this point?) that movies of today could go away (like black and white).</p>
<p>Knowing full well that&#8217;s the wrong attitude and that it could be an experience millions could enjoy, I do hope they have some provision for single eye&#8217;d folks to be able to enjoy these films. </p>
<p>Have you ever watched a cheesy 3D movie released on TV? or closed one eye while wearing those blue and red glasses from hell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quadrant99.com/weblog/2005/03/22/new-3-d-movie-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
